Culturally, public policy is justified all the more that cultural products are not like other goods or merchandise are not at all. The creation in this area is neither identical reproducible or consumable according to traditional schemas that the market imposes. If it is not a public service in the same way as the administrative and other services of the population, it is nen no less a public good or a service that dintrtgnral contributes define some values in the country. It is therefore normal that the government financially and morally help cultural creation. One can place the action dailleurs mass educative (school, university, vocational training center) as falling to part of public policies for culture, for part of public policy in favor of Research/development. From this point of view the theories of human capital connivent education as a human investment, the order to monetize ultrieurement its benefit, Not quune harbor e limit.
Whether before or after the crisis, the economic justification, social, political, and moral therefore not lacking in support of the public policy. Still, nor his field, nor their finalists nor their efficacy are tables. Whereas in the things of a principled point of view, we can say that the field of public policy will continue to larger: besides the problems related to the complexity of the organization of territories n assistant public interventions, we can imagine the future aisment carries more imprieuses ncessits under such global problems (including environmental) facing courtyard, dj nations and the international community as a whole. Laide survival (and not the development) of some peoples has a moral dimension plantar denvergure.
The moral dimension invite also in the debates between economists, sociologists, and political scientists (not to mention the strictly political debates) given the widening inequalities between populations fringes of the same country and between populations of different countries inequalities which are justified in one case as in the other parts by purely economic arguments about productivity, for example. A The reverse, these are economic arguments that justify public The intervention in favor of SMEs which, while constituting the main thing of the industrial fabric of a country at the same time what are the purveyors of jobs, face competition from large companies and multinationals. Putting them technical, organizational, and Financial is a requirement that governments can not ngliger not only because it can help countries out of the crisis of growth in which they are plongs, but also because which can help in a second time replenish the coffers of the State if it results provide a value-added surplus.
